Oil prices fall in the wake of SVB collapse
SVB Financial Group (commonly known as SVB) is a publicly traded financial services company that specializes in financial services to the innovation economy, providing financing, banking, and investment services to technology, life science, healthcare, and venture capital industries. As of 2021, SVB had a market capitalization of over $50 billion. So, what caused the collapse that started the most significant financial crisis since 2008, and why has this an impact on oil prices?
Three factors As for why SVB, the $212bn tech-lender suddenly collapsed has no one quick simple answer. Some argue, it was due to the Trump-era regulation rollbacks, some say risk mismanagement at the bank, and others sharp interest rate rises after a decade of ultra-low borrowing costs. But most likely it was due to a combination of all three factors.
Dodd-Frank was a comprehensive piece of legislation that was enacted by the U.S. Congress in 2010 in response to the 2008 financial crisis, with the aim to improve financial stability, increase transparency and accountability in the financial system, and protect consumers from abusive financial practices.
Dodd-Frank required that banks with at least $50bn in assets – banks considered “systemically important” – undergo an annual Federal Reserve “stress test” and maintain certain levels of capital.
SVB’s chief executive, Greg Becker, argued before Congress in 2015 that the $50bn threshold (SVB held $40bn at the time) was unnecessary and his bank, like other “mid-sized” or regional banks, “does not present systemic risks”.
In 2018 former president Donald Trump, with support by Congress signed a new bill that undid some of the capital requirements imposed under the Dodd-Frank act. At that time Trump said the new bill went a “long way toward fixing” Dodd-Frank, which he called a “job-killer”.
The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) warned before the bill passed that raising the threshold would “increase the likelihood that a large financial firm with assets of between $100bn and $250bn would fail.”
And late last week the Vermont senator Bernie Sanders took to Twitter and argued that the culprit of the SVB collapse was the “absurd” law Trump signed in 2018.
SVB’s Mismanagement?
According to reports that are now being investigated by the Federal Reserve, SVB did not have a chief risk officer (CRO) for some of 2022.
SVB’s previous CRO, Laura Izurieta, quit her job at the bank in October 2021 but stopped performing the role in April 2022, and it wasn’t until December that the bank managed to fill that crucial vacant role.
The bank went seven months without a CRO even though the board’s risk committee was meeting frequently before the bank collapsed.
– It means perhaps management was hiding something or didn’t want to disclose something, or had disagreements over the risks it was taking, said Reed Kathrein, a lawyer specializing in shareholder lawsuits, to Bloomberg.
SVB’s ESG, environmental, social and corporate governance-driven investing has also come under scrutiny in the wake of the collapse with the bank being accused of prioritizing social justice over financial management.
The Republican House oversight committee chairman, James Comer, called SVB “one of the most woke banks”.
Comments
Post a Comment